Over the past few years I have experimented with many pano stitching solutions: Photoshop; PTGui; and Microsoft ICE etc etc. All work well and all have ‘weaknesses’ or quirks.
Let’s be clear up front: all the above work ‘perfectly’ if you mount your camera-lens system’s entrance pupil correctly relative to the ‘point of rotation’, either in a planar arrangement or in 3D space. Hence, if I have time, and wish to carry it with me to a photo shot, I will use my Fotomate Pano Kit.
But what if I wish to shoot a pano and I don’t have my Fotomate kit with me? How successful can you be get with hand held panos; and how effective are the various pano stitching programs when confronted with a handheld capture sequence?
After some experiments I have now settled on Kolor’s AutoPano as my preferred tool; and in particular AutoPano Giga: http://www.kolor.com/image-stitching-software-autopano-giga.html
As an example, I threw a hand held sequence (taken with a 24mm lens at F/4 and ISO 6400) of the inside of the Roman Catholic cathedral in downtown Santa Fe: the Cathedral Basilica of Saint Francis of Assisi, commonly known as Saint Francis Cathedral.
Wiki tells us that the cathedral was built by Archbishop Jean Baptiste Lamy between 1869 and 1886 on the site of an older adobe church, La Parroquia (built in 1714–1717). An older church on the same site, built in 1626, was destroyed in the 1680 Pueblo Revolt. The new cathedral was built around La Parroquia, which was dismantled once the new construction was complete. A small chapel on the north side of the cathedral was kept from the old church.
The ‘input’ images had large amounts of image-to-image geometric changes and there were people moving around between the individual captures.
So how did Autopano Giga do? Well you decide from this image that was created in Autopano Giga simply using its default mapping algorithms.