I believe our development as photographers goes in cycles of
continuous increasing (bootstrapping) our skills both on the technical and artistry
side of our craft. Today, thanks to a winter storm where we live, I spent the
day at home concentrating on increasing my technical skills; and in particular
how to achieve tack sharp images over the depth of focus that I require for my
capture.
All photographers are conscious of the limitations that our
lenses and cameras bring to our craft, namely: depth of focus and aberrations
inherently linked to the ‘physics’ of our equipment. When we first develop as
photographers we soon become aware that you can only be in focus in one plane
that is orthogonal to the lens axis (assuming you are not using a tilt shift lens).
All other image slices are, by definition, out of focus. However, we accept
this ‘out of focusness’ as long as it looks acceptable when we print or project
it (on paper or our computer screen).
Typically we define a print to be tack sharp by line pairs
per mm, eg 10 lp/mm for a 250mm print size is usually considered ‘good’, and we
talk of circles of confusion for our sensors, eg for my Canon 5DIII a CoC of
about 30 microns is typically quoted as the number to use for depth of focus
calculations.
There are many depth of focus calculators on line and you
can download Apps to your iPhone or IPad as well. The majority of these
calculators, however, suffer in one key area, namely they don’t account for diffraction.
After comparing several Apps and looking into some math, I
have now settled on three complementary Apps from the same author: http://goo.gl/qU792m. If nothing else I
encourage you to read the articles that are on the home page.
I have all three photography Apps (TrueDOF-Pro, OptimumCS-Pro
and FocusStacker), and can recommend all three as money well spent. Having all
three, and reading the author’s articles, will greatly increase your depth of focus
understanding and your tack sharp image capture.
Rather than repeat what you can read, here is an example of
what can be achieved. The attached is a test shoot I took using FocusStacker
with my 14mm lens (on the 5DIII). To get the best tack sharp image, rather than
use a blur spot of 30 microns (blur spot = the RMSQ (CoC and the diffraction
spot)) I used one of 15 microns.
Using TrueDoF-Pro I knew that I would need to shoot at just
under F8 and focus at about 9ft. These numbers would give me an acceptable
focus from about 4.5ft to infinity. But I knew I could do better by focus
stacking.
Turning to FocusStacker, I knew I needed to set my aperture to
F7.1 and take 5 images at 1.1ft, 1.4ft, 2.0ft, 3.3ft and 10ft. Taking these
images would increase my (tack sharp, 15 micron class) depth of focus from
infinity down to 1ft. About as good as it gets!
To make things interesting I also decided to do this in a
high contrast environment (internal lights and an outside scene) that needed bracketing,
so at each focus point I took five brackets.
Having captured the data, it was ‘simply’ a matter of
following this workflow:
- Ingest the images into LR
- Carry out basic corrections, eg white balance
- Export from LR each set of five brackets to Photomatix 5
- Use Fusion in Photomatix rather than Tone Mapping (more photo realistic)
- Auto import back into LR
- Export the five fused brackets into Photoshop-CC as layers
- Align the layers
- Auto Blend the layers
- Auto import back into LR
- Finish off in LR
Bottom line: as we develop our photography skills, we become
ever more critical of our efforts. Composition, colour balance and other artistic
skills sets are all well and good, however, if the data captured is too soft,
or just out of focus, then we will not achieve the desired result: personal satisfaction
and, hopefully, praise. Single focus image capture may not always be
sufficient. If you wish to capture large depths of focus, eg 1ft to infinity, then
focus stacking is a must, and so are some calculations. I thoroughly recommend the
three Apps I have mentioned above at http://goo.gl/qU792m
No comments:
Post a Comment